This comparative case study of the recovery outcomes from two of the most devastating urban catastrophes in American history lays bare the social inequality inherent in racially arranged, capital-based economies.
Series: The Katrina Bookshelf
A lethal mix of natural disaster, dangerously flawed construction, and reckless human actions devastated San Francisco in 1906 and New Orleans in 2005. Eighty percent of the built environments of both cities were destroyed in the catastrophes, and the poor, the elderly, and the medically infirm were disproportionately among the thousands who perished. These striking similarities in the impacts of cataclysms separated by a century impelled Steve Kroll-Smith to look for commonalities in how the cities recovered from disaster. In Recovering Inequality, he builds a convincing case that disaster recovery and the reestablishment of social and economic inequality are inseparable.
Kroll-Smith demonstrates that disaster and recovery in New Orleans and San Francisco followed a similar pattern. In the immediate aftermath of the flooding and the firestorm, social boundaries were disordered and the communities came together in expressions of unity and support. But these were quickly replaced by other narratives and actions, including the depiction of the poor as looters, uneven access to disaster assistance, and successful efforts by the powerful to take valuable urban real estate from vulnerable people. Kroll-Smith concludes that inexorable market forces ensured that recovery efforts in both cities would reestablish the patterns of inequality that existed before the catastrophes. The major difference he finds between the cities is that, from a market standpoint, New Orleans was expendable, while San Francisco rose from the ashes because it was a hub of commerce.
“In this study of two iconic American cities and the aftermath of disaster, Kroll-Smith masterfully reveals how the process of post-disaster reconstruction reflects and expresses the fundamental tensions and contradictions in our social, economic, and environmental relations.”
Anthony Oliver-Smith, from the foreword
"This is an inspired, illuminating, often anguished comparison. Stimulating fresh questions, Recovering Inequality teaches many lessons about the sources of urban catastrophe, whether by fire or water, and reveals how recurring, indeed deep-rooted, processes shaped social hierarchies both in revitalized San Francisco and rebuilt New Orleans."
Ira Katznelson, Columbia University, author of Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time
“This book pushes the boundaries of scholarship on disasters, asking sobering questions about the role of market forces in disaster recovery. While retaining what anthropologists call ‘thick description’ of both case studies, the book offers rich theoretical insights, zooming out to Marx, Durkheim, Weber, and the foundations of modern US sociology.”
Mark Schuller, Northern Illinois University, author of Humanitarian Aftershocks in Haiti
“This book makes important contributions to the field of disaster social science specifically and sociology more broadly. Recovery is one of four major phases of the disaster cycle, but the concept lacks clarity in the broader literature. Traditional views of recovery as a ‘return to normal’ and ‘setting things right’ obscure more than enlighten the nuances of ‘recovery.’ This book’s focus on inequality provides much-needed insight on this phase of disaster. Its focus on market forces in re-establishing unequal social statuses and determining the worthiness of receiving relief promotes a re-examination of this important phase of disaster recovery.”
Duane Gill, Oklahoma State University, coauthor of The Exxon Valdez Disaster: Readings on a Modern Social Problem